探花视频

Brexit ‘being ignored’ as cause of UK universities’ problems

Loss of EU students made recruitment more commercial and universities more insular, argues new book

Published on
十月 14, 2025
Last updated
十月 14, 2025
Steve Bray, famous brexit campaigner, holds up signs Brexit Elephant in the room and Brexit shooting self in foot as various different groups held demonstrations outside the ACC conference centre, 22 September, 2024.
Source: Milo Chandler/Alamy

The loss of students from Europe after Brexit is the “elephant in the room” when considering many of the problems UK higher education now faces, according to the authors of a new book.

Based on more than 120 interviews with university leaders and academic staff,??explores how the loss of a once “vibrant” cohort created a “more impoverished version of UK universities”.

Co-author Simon Marginson, professor of higher education at the universities of Bristol and Oxford, said it was “absolutely impossible” to properly interrogate?the consequences of the 2016 referendum?at the time because of resistance from the political system.

“Once the Brexit vote had occurred, then it was just unshakeable, it was kind of holy writ. Well, that’s almost a decade ago now,” he told?探花视频.

“It’s possible to rethink this, and our book is a small contribution to the rethinking. Once it’s happened, we have a really clear picture, so academics like us can come in and say this is the reality that we now are in.”

The number of EU students entering UK institutions more than halved between 2020-21 and 2021-22 after new rules came in that?made them pay full international student fees.

In addition to the profound change in student numbers, co-author Vassiliki Papatsiba, a reader in social sciences at Cardiff University, said the book shows how this led to a more “commercial approach” in international higher education.

“It hasn’t improved equity in the system, it hasn’t given more opportunities to students from the Global South, it has certainly made it more stratified, and I think more unequal.”

With far fewer EU students, Marginson said international recruitment has moved from being viewed as a “cross-cultural programme” to just a business, with overseas students often seen as a “bag of cash”.

Some of the participants, interviewed between 2017 and 2019, raised fears that Brexit represented an “existential risk” to the sector. Others were worried that the loss of EU students would threaten a university’s view of itself as European and diminish the international atmosphere on the campus.

For Papatsiba, EU students were a hybrid between international and domestic – bringing a different cultural linguistic dimension and different worldviews, as well as academic excellence.

“I don’t get the sense that anyone really makes a direct attribution [between] having much more competition now and Brexit.

“On student diversity, there is no discussion of having fewer, European students, so I don’t think that there is this direct attribution to Brexit. It feels almost like the elephant in the room.”

One interviewee was worried that reduced demand from the EU would make competition for UK students “even more intense than it is at the moment”.

Along with the declining value of the domestic student fee and ceilings on full-fee international students, the book raises concerns that “the breaking of ties with Europe will render the sector both poorer and more insular, trapped within shrinking horizons”.

Marginson said he hopes the open-access book will draw attention to the “invisible ripple effects” of Brexit and the loss of the “positive potential” from EU students.

“UK universities have just become more insular, more nation focused, more nation limited, than they were and their European consciousness, their European identity, has been sloughed off like a snakeskin and they roll on regardless.”

patrick.jack@timeshighereducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (4)

A collection of ad-libs apparently driven more by the intellectual predilections of the authors than by hard facts, How has the loss of EU students driven the decline in UK unis? Pre-Brexit EU students made a modest share of of income. What exactly isa "commercial" approach to HE? If you mean funded by students rather than the public, that direction of travel was underway well before Brexit with the introduction of fees. Why is it the role of UK universities to "create opportunities for students from the 'global south'? How has Brexit trapped students in shrinking horizons" assuming you are referring to FOMO how does it effect students more so than other UK citizens? If you are going ti refer yo an "invisible ripple" you need to identify how you determine the existence of the "ripple". The article slacks a clear hypothesis [its beginning is more a murmour of discontent better suited to a psarty political speech], presents no objective evidence yet alone a causal connection.
... and the response of the people who voted for Brexit to this book will be either a) "what book"? or b) "we're sick of experts."
Anybody know how much of the fees loans made to EU Ss over the years to Brexit are scheduled to be written off as irrecoverable from graduates now back in other nations and well beyond the reach of HMRC? Why was the UK taxpayer subsiding EU citizens to attend UK Us? - and how much did that subsidy cost or will it eventually cost? And the data on student movement? - How many EUs came to UK Us? How many UK UGs went to EU Us instead of UK Us?
new
The old John Cleese line about Stating the Bleeding Obvious springs to mind .... Academics are interviewed and are not particularly enamored with how Brexit has worked out ... Given that the vast majority of them were extremely anti it all along then quelle surprise ... What the article lacks is any substantive evidence . But that won't surprise anyone with even a passing knowledge of how academia works these days ..and while I am at it ...what has the global South got to do with the matter ...
ADVERTISEMENT