探花视频

Expel students who threaten academics on campus, says John Mann

Government’s antisemitism adviser condemns masked protesters who disrupted lecture being given by Israeli economics professor

Published on
十月 24, 2025
Last updated
十月 24, 2025
Source: UK Parliament

Students who threaten or intimidate university staff should be expelled, the UK government’s antisemitism adviser has said, after masked protesters allegedly threatened to behead an economics professor during a lecture.

John Mann, a former Labour MP who now sits in the House of Lords, has defended Michael Ben-Gad, a professor of economics at City St George’s, University of London, after pro-Palestinian activists called for him to be sacked and labelled him a “terrorist” because he served in the Israeli Defence Force.

More than 1,000 academics from across the UK have also signed a statement supporting the professor, warning that the campaign against him “sets a precedent under which others could be targeted in the future”.

Signatories include faculty from Imperial College London and the University of Oxford, who said they “deplore any campaign that seeks to?intimidate and drive out lecturers because they are Israeli, Jewish, or members of any other group”.

Ben-Gad, who has worked at City since 2008 and served as head of department from 2010 to 2013, told Sky News this week that his lecture had been invaded by protesters who “came right up to me and screamed in my face, called me a war criminal and a Nazi”.

“They refused to leave, they were masked. One of them made a threat about having my head chopped off.”?

Videos posted online by a group calling itself City Action for Palestine show masked protesters confronting Ben-Gad and chanting “all terrorists off our campus” and “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free”.

“Free speech does not allow university, college or other educational staff to be hassled [or] intimidated at their place of work,” Mann told?探花视频.

“What happened is the antithesis of free speech. Those who threaten in this way should be immediately expelled from higher education.

“The burning of books, the breaking up of lectures and the targeting of individual academics and other educational staff is the same thing – an attack on free speech and democracy. The sanctioning should be actioned accordingly,” said Mann, who has served numerous governments as an independent adviser on antisemitism since 2019.

Mann’s intervention followed a statement by the Royal Economic Society (RES) published on 24 October that said it was “deeply concerned by reports that an?academic economist has been publicly harassed at a London university because they are Israeli” and that it was “in direct contact with the individual concerned and with the university”.

The society added: “Targeting an individual in this manner is unacceptable. It undermines the safety and dignity of members of the academic community and has no place in a university setting.”

City president Anthony Finkelstein has also condemned the actions of what he called a “small, masked group of individuals from a group unaffiliated with this university”.

Supporters said the campaign against Ben-Gad risked chilling academic freedom and deterring open discussion of Israel and the Middle East within universities.

A spokesperson for Campaign Against Antisemitism?told?探花视频 that “a deluge of abuse and intimidation has overwhelmed Jewish students and staff on university campuses across the country” since the 7 October 2023 Hamas terrorist attack in Israel.

“The vicious campaign to target Professor Ben-Gad is the latest manifestation of this alarming and?dangerous rise in antisemitic harassment within these environments,” they added.

“It is generally recognised that the normalisation over the last two years of the kind of hateful rhetoric being directed at him was a factor in the terrorist atrocity in Manchester at the beginning of this month, in which two Jews were murdered while attending synagogue on Yom Kippur.

"The behaviour of the students involved was not only reprehensible, but the incident demonstrates the environment that has been allowed to develop at City, as well as on campuses across the country.”

The spokesperson said that “for all their virtuous anti-racism rhetoric, our universities have become epicentres of Jew-hatred. Something is desperately wrong”.

“City St George’s must investigate these incidents immediately and report them to the police where necessary. We are writing to the university.”

A university spokesperson said:?“City St George's fully supports and upholds freedom of expression within the law and is willing to engage in lawful discussion and debate across the full range of topics.

“However, unlawful and repugnant attempts to obstruct and interfere with our academic operations are another thing entirely, and the university will not tolerate the harassment of its staff and students.

“We reject the unlawful actions of this small group of individuals that is neither affiliated with the university nor its students’ union. We are investigating the incident. We will continue to support and protect our staff and students, including Michael, who has the full support of the university and its senior management team, as well as colleagues of all faiths and backgrounds.”

tash.mosheim@timeshighereducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (5)

Paul Woodgates Senior Independent Governor De Montfort University The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH Email: paul.woodgates@dmu.ac.uk Date: October 24, 2025 Subject: Formal Complaint Regarding Vice-Chancellor Katie Normington’s Misconduct and Request for Suspension and Independent Investigation Dear Mr. Woodgates, As a concerned [stakeholder – e.g., staff member, student, or alumnus/a of De Montfort University], I am writing to formally raise serious concerns about the conduct of Vice-Chancellor Professor Katie Normington and the apparent failure of governance under the Chair of the Board of Governors, Ian Squires. The ongoing crises at DMU—marked by financial mismanagement, suppression of free speech, and a culture of intimidation—require urgent action. I respectfully request the immediate suspension of Professor Normington pending a transparent, independent investigation into her leadership and the Board’s oversight, particularly Mr. Squires’ role in protecting her. Grounds for Complaint Misuse of Prevent Duty to Suppress Free Speech On 9 September 2025, DMU’s Executive Director of People Services, Bridget Donoghue, acting on behalf of Professor Normington’s leadership team, threatened to report a private online town hall meeting to the Office for Students (OfS) under the Prevent duty. This meeting, organized by staff and union representatives to discuss redundancies and mismanagement, involved invited guests including Leicester South MP Shockat Adam and Green Party councillor Patrick Kitterick. The threat to flag this legitimate discussion as a terrorism-related risk is a gross overreach and an attack on free speech. It follows a 2020 precedent where DMU overzealously reported student essays under Prevent, eroding trust. This misuse undermines DMU’s commitment to academic freedom and risks breaching legal protections for union activity and expression. Financial Mismanagement and Neglect of Core Mission Under Professor Normington’s leadership since August 2020, DMU has faced: Excessive Executive Spending: Over ?277,000 on business-class flights and other expenses since 2022, equivalent to entire research institute budgets, while claiming a “financial crisis” to justify over 100 redundancies. Risky International Ventures: Over ?12 million diverted to a failing Dubai campus, now subject to a ?42 million lawsuit, and the creation of Innovative Educational Partnerships Ltd to hire London staff on inferior terms, bypassing UK employment law. Academic Decline: Abandonment of the “top 30” ambition, a failed “block teaching” model implemented without consultation, and asset sales to fund overseas franchises, neglecting DMU’s role as a Leicester “city of sanctuary.” These have led to a drop to 120th in national rankings, loss of TEF Gold status, and unsustainable student-staff ratios. Governance Failures and Culture of Intimidation Professor Normington’s centralized control has sidelined staff and student input, with over ?5 million spent on external HR consultants in five years to enforce a “weaponised redundancy programme.” This has created a “doom-loop” of demoralization, evidenced by: Four votes of no confidence (May and June 2025 from the Professoriate, staff, and students). Over 300 student signatures demanding her resignation in July 2025. Chronic understaffing, course closures, and cancelled classes, harming DMU’s academic reputation. Bullying and systematic firing of top research talent, replacing them with cheaper industry staff who lack the academic expertise to lead university courses independently, requiring academics to oversee them. Abusing power to dismiss whistleblowers through sham redundancies, targeting those who raise concerns about mismanagement. Denying emeritus status to deserving staff on bogus grounds, such as claims that they do not respect or get along with Professor Normington and her leadership delegates, further entrenching a culture of fear and retaliation. Ian Squires’ Bias and Failure of Oversight As Chair of the Board of Governors, Ian Squires has failed to hold Professor Normington accountable, despite widespread evidence of mismanagement. His defense of “good governance” ignores staff surveys, legal threats (e.g., Dubai lawsuit), and no-confidence motions explicitly criticizing his leadership. By shielding the Vice-Chancellor, Mr. Squires has enabled a toxic regime, undermining the Board’s duty to ensure accountability. Requested Actions Given the severity and breadth of these issues, I urge you, as Senior Independent Governor and Chair of the Finance and Performance Committee, to: Suspend Professor Katie Normington immediately, pending a full investigation into her leadership and decision-making. Commission an Independent Investigation into: The misuse of the Prevent duty to suppress free speech. Financial mismanagement, including executive expenses and risky international ventures. Governance failures, particularly Ian Squires’ apparent bias in protecting the Vice-Chancellor. Allegations of bullying, targeted firings of researchers and whistleblowers, improper hiring practices, and denial of emeritus status. Ensure Transparency: Publish the investigation’s terms and outcomes, restoring trust among staff, students, and the Leicester community. Engage Stakeholders: Consult with the Universities and Colleges Union (UCU), student representatives, and the DMU Professoriate to address the ongoing crises. Conclusion De Montfort University’s civic mission and academic reputation are at stake. The misuse of anti-terrorism laws to silence dissent, coupled with financial recklessness, governance failures, bullying, and retaliatory practices, represents a betrayal of DMU’s values as a public institution. As a senior governor, you have a duty to act decisively to protect the university and its community. Failure to address these issues risks further reputational damage, potential legal challenges, and intervention by the Office for Students. I look forward to your prompt response and confirmation of the steps the Board will take. Please direct correspondence to Professor JWS Alicia
Follow student codes of conduct and civil rights/free speech laws. Period.
All universities should take decisive action on these types of acts rather than behave like a toothless tiger with verbal or written 'condemnation'. I agree with student misconduct investigations and expulsion (if found guilty). There is no place for such hooligan behaviour.
It is good that as academics we are taking a stand at last. But for too long we have sat back and allowed our colleagues who may or may not hold a different opinion over a series of issues, from ours to be harassed, hounded and bullied, often by masked individuals using coercive, even violent rhetoric and done nothing. Often we have simply caved in to this. Any comment from Jo O Grady or UCU on this? She's not usually shy about putting her opinions forward?
new
Decisive action? You must be joking. If there is any it will be a first.
ADVERTISEMENT