探花视频

More universities could join new Kent-Greenwich group, says v-c

Incoming leader of new entity says course sharing on the cards ‘where it makes sense’ as unions fear merger will result in more job cuts

Published on
九月 11, 2025
Last updated
九月 11, 2025
Montage of University of Greenwich students on graduation day in the grounds of the Old Royal Naval College, and the Templeman Library at the University of Kent. To illustrate the merger between the two universities.
Source: Alamy montage

The incoming vice-chancellor of a soon-to-be merged university group said there is now a “blueprint” for others to join the newly formed entity, but said she could not rule out job cuts as the institutions join forces.

The universities of Kent and Greenwich have announced their intention to form a “superuniversity”, set to be called London and South East University Group, which will become one of the largest institutions in the UK.?

Although?both institutions have denied that financial troubles were behind the move, Jane Harrington, the current vice-chancellor of the University of Greenwich who will become the leader of the new group, said that if the merger were not to go ahead, “almost certainly each institution would have to do restructuring”.

“What I would say if staff are concerned, is that we are likely to look at it, and I suspect there’ll be some restructuring. But my absolute ambition is that we will get ourselves very quickly to a place where we are financially stable and resilient, and that actually enables us to go forward.”

Course sharing between the institutions could be considered “where it makes sense”, potentially in areas where the group is looking to grow into new areas, but Harrington noted that there will be many instances where “it doesn’t make sense”.?

“If you’re doing accounting or finance at Canterbury or you’re doing it at Greenwich, you’re doing it at those local institutions,” she said.

The group could also expand to allow other institutions to join the newly formed entity, Harrington said, adding that they have designed a “blueprint”?which?means “other institutions in time could come into the organisation as well”.

But staff at both institutions have described how the news came as a “shock” that has caused stress among colleagues, and the?University and College Union (UCU) branches from both universities confirmed that they had not been consulted on the merger before the announcement.?

Both universities have made staff cuts in recent years – with?Greenwich announcing plans to cut 300 staff?last year, while Kent has embarked on?successive years of staff cuts and course closures?– sparking fresh fears over what impact the merger might have on jobs.

Ruth Ballardie, co-chair of the University of Greenwich UCU, said that many staff had found out about the news through the media, and that the announcement came “completely out of the blue”.

She said immediate concerns among staff revolved around how the merger could impact job security, pay, and pensions, adding that staff at Greenwich are on the Teachers’ Pension Scheme, while staff at Kent are on the Universities Superannuation Scheme, which has a far lower employer contribution rate.

Despite its job cuts, Ballardie observed that Greenwich posted a??in its most recent financial statement, and questioned what it had to gain from the merger.

“You can’t tell me they’re going to merge and not have redundancies, it would not make logical sense. Why is Greenwich picking up an institution that’s in a much worse financial position?”

Kent UCU committee member and media lecturer Heidi Colthup said the news?was a “shock” to staff and comes during a period of restructuring of its professional services division, as well as?changes to the academic term, which?means?staff have needed to redesign courses to fit the new model.

She said it was “disappointing” that the unions had not been consulted but added that she hopes staff can build better relations with the new management.

The sector’s worsening financial situation has prompted universities to look at new operating models, and the progress of the London and South East University Group will be watched closely across the sector.?

Diana Beech, director of the Finsbury Institute at City St George’s, University of London – another recently merged university – said the move feels “less like a conventional merger and more like a strategic alignment of two institutions united by a shared commitment to enhancing opportunity and prosperity across a common region”.

She said its success will hinge on whether it leads to “a meaningful transformation of both universities’ business models”.?

“A superuniversity spanning London and the south east certainly offers scale and reach, but the real test will be whether it delivers genuine innovation in provision, governance and delivery, and whether students and staff tangibly benefit from the change,” Beech told?THE.?

“If this partnership can move beyond simple structural integration to become a catalyst for new thinking and regional impact, it could set a powerful precedent for place-based collaboration in UK higher education.”

juliette.rowsell@timeshighereducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (10)

new
Might be successful IF the new joint/third entity gobbles up FE provision across the sub-region to achieve economy of scale and deliver much needed joined-up TE (HE + TE) - but hard to see how a financially stressed Kent gains if hoping to continue to be R-oriented and hence needing cash to subsidise R activity on which overhead recovery is so woefully low. And K’s financial weakness is probably why this is not a merger of K/G nor a take-over by G of K - the former would mean K’s staff being TUPE’d across to a new entity as an underfunded burden and the latter across to G as a massive liability that would weaken G…
new
The Kent estate muct be very valuable and you could get the asset strippers in?
new
I hope my University joins this new outfit as it's not very good and this lot seems to be better so its a win for me if they do, provided I don't get made redundant of course, in which case I would rather stay out of it.
new
Well do you know, I suppose it depends on who you are merging with. If it's somewhere which is preceived to be more prestigious then this would be quite attractive, on the other hand if it's with a HEI which appears a bit less on the strong side, as it were, then you might not want them on board your life boat, bogging you down.
new
Well yes exactly, and you also might get rationalised and told to go over to the other place, which might not be so nice, and teach your course there, while they come over and teach their courses in your place. So I am all in favour of the merger so long as I get something out of it, but not if I lose out myself. I know at Greenwich they do have some very lovely buildings I would quite like to get myself an office in, but then I hear the good buildings are all taken by the admin and managers, as one would expect, and acadmic staff there have to "hot desk" on a first come first served basis. So you have to add that into the mix as well.
new
Well I am sure some will do well out of it. I expect it will be hefty pay rises all round for the VCs and their pals and redundancy notices for some of their staff.
new
The London and South East University Group. It has a very catchy name I think. But we will see how it all goes down with the students. I suppose it will have c 45k students and will be a power in the land. I am all for this, shaking and mixing things up a little. What will happen on the office front? Will staff at Greenwich campus struggle with the hot desking whule colleagues at Kent retain their spacious individual offices I wonder?
new
I don’t see much difference between this and other federal universities in England - London, Oxford and Cambridge. Or even UClan having a university in Cyprus (it’s not simply a campus in Cyprus). Think also back to the Victoria University that only split in 1903 to become Manchester, Leeds and Liverpool. The novelty here is the size of the two universities coming together, but that is surely just a matter of where we are starting from. If Kings College London and UCL were fully independent and said they planned to come together as the University of London, wouldn’t it be the same?
new
Well I think it will be about rationalising the offerings and introducing economies of scale, presumably centralised services such as payroll etc across the institutions. You will also have a more substantial crtical mass etc. Presumably the new University will be gpo into REF 2029 as a HEI with submissions in its various subjects, so it should be syronger as a large institution. Were the English deps of UCL and KCL to go in as one unit to the REF panel then they would be much stronger than individually for example. I guess that is the sort of thing they are up to here. And of course any unecessary duplication in offerings can be eliminated.
new
I have heard that Greenwich do not allow academic staff individual offices to work in. Is that true? Will that policy vbe rolled out across the Super University. Not so super in which case in my view!
ADVERTISEMENT