Gary Thomas (鈥Have to admit it鈥檚 getting better, a little better all the time鈥, 15聽August), as befits a professor of education, believes that with reference to intelligence 鈥渙ur abilities are getting better all the time鈥 and he cites the 鈥淔lynn effect鈥 in support of this assertion. However, if聽we accept that a聽fast reaction time is a聽component of high intelligence, then things become a bit more complicated.
In a recent journal article (鈥淲ere the Victorians cleverer than us?鈥, Intelligence), Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis and Raegan Murphy demonstrate in a scrupulous meta-analysis of objectively measured reaction time data, that on average we are in fact slowing down and people in the Victorian area were faster than we are. So, as reaction time does indeed correlate with g, the general factor of intelligence, it looks as though Flynn鈥檚 view of a never-ending increase in intelligence may be a聽comforting illusion.
R. E. Rawles
UCL honorary research fellow in psychology
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?