探花视频

Kyle ‘out of touch’ for claiming British students ‘lack drive’

Former science secretary accused British students of lacking ‘vigour’ 

Published on
September 19, 2025
Last updated
September 19, 2025
Picture of Peter Kyle, the business secretary, against a grey backdrop
Source: UK government

The UK’s business secretary is facing a backlash after claiming British students lack “drive” compared to their American counterparts.

Speaking at an event in London hosted by the AI giant Nvidia on Thursday, Peter Kyle, who was recently promoted from secretary of state for science and technology, told investors that British students don’t have the entrepreneurship and “vigour” shown by American students.?

Speaking about his experience of meeting students at Stanford University and asking them why they had chosen to go to university, he said: “Every single student in that group of 10 or 12 said because they want to set a company up – there wasn’t one that said they didn’t.”

But in Britain, “if you went to a group of undergraduates, how big would that group have to be before you found someone that said their choice of going to university, and that choice of going to that specific university, was because they wanted to become a founder?

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

“The entrepreneurialism simply isn’t there – the drive, the vigour.”

Kyle continued: “Too often, people go to university to ‘explore research and knowledge’. I want people to go to university…to start businesses in our country.”

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

The comments have sparked a backlash on social media, with commenting, “Heaven forbid that students go to university to learn something!”, while ?on Bluesky noted: “Every year my students are driven and engaged, some studying despite dealing with unbelievably hard situations. And ministers like him spout nonsense without troubling to think about how insulting it is.”

Another?Bluesky user? “out of touch”, while others highlighted the financial strain UK universities are under.

Kyle made?similar comments at a Universities UK conference earlier this month, where he questioned why such small numbers of UK students see university as a foundation for launching their own business or commercialising their ideas.

He said at the UK conference that the country’s regions needed leaders “with a clear vision and the ability to inspire organisations from all sectors and deep down into communities to achieve things that they didn’t previously know or believe was possible”.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

“If your area lacks ambition, clarity of economic vision and leadership, then please ask yourself, what is stopping you from using the colossal resource of your university, combined with your leadership skills, to inspire the change that your region or area might need?” he questioned.?

juliette.rowsell@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (4)

Of course this is a generalisation. But there is some truth in what PK says here. Others have discussed what they call the gold-standard "sub-Oxbridge" pedagogic model of intensive small group teaching combined with the application of the self-identification mental health agenda in which staff members are expected to be pro-active in dealing with student issues. This encourages a passivity in the student body as a whole as the onus is always placeced on the member of staff, not the student, to address any problems. The US system, like the country, is very much more red in tooth and claw as a mass HE system and if the student does not keep up, or is unable to keep up, then they very quickly they fall by the wayside and exit and have no one to blame but themselves. You can't have both I am afraid.
Yes this is true I think. Either you have a system which puts the onus on the student to work hard and succeed as in the US or you have a system where the onus is on the academic tutor to make sure that the student succeeds as in the UK. The former is tough and can be harsh, the latter cosier but very gruelling and more stressful for the academic member of staff with students "reaching out" endlessy and at all times and on all occasions. Both inculcate different habits and ethics in the student. Increasingly, we hear stories of substantial graduate unemployment in the UK.
Yes but we are well and truly over the barrel on this one! We are desperate to recruit students to save our jobs and completely governed by that wreched NSS regime by which the students will do for us if we don't pander to their every whim and at every opportunity. It would be a very brave University with very robust admissions indeed that would be prepared to inculcate a work ethics and habits of self reliance preparimg its students for the harsher climate of the world of work. Maybe Mr Kyle might reflect on the relationship between his Teachuing Assessment regime and the phenomenon of the lack of vigour of UK strudents cmpared woth US??
Not everyone can be an entrepreneur. Some students start their own business. Some work for a company applying the skills they have learnt during a degree, for example in electronic design - this is equally important. Other students might choose to teach STEM subjects at school - also important. There are many ways to contribute to society. People have different skills and interests. It is not a student's fault if they do not have the skills to become an entrepreneur. The best that universities can do is to help students who have the ability and desire to start a business to develop these skills. Knowledge, research and critical thinking are important skills in a variety of jobs and this is the main role of universities. The fact that Peter Kyle does not realise this is worrying. He needs to find out more about what is taught in STEM subjects at university.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT