探花视频

MPs criticise 'sloppy' data on alternative provider enrolments

'Mind-boggling' that the Department for Education does not regularly collect data on attendance, committee hears

Published on
January 16, 2018
Last updated
January 16, 2018
Student loans sign

An MP has described the government鈥檚 struggle to monitor the attendance of students at alternative higher education providers in England as 鈥渕ind-boggling鈥 and 鈥渟loppy鈥.

Appearing before the House of Commons鈥 public accounts committee, Jonathan Slater, permanent secretary at the Department for Education, said that annual data returns were the only way his staff had of monitoring how many students in receipt of tuition fee loans were actually attending courses at their college.

MPs on the panel expressed concern about this, amid ongoing concern about high dropout rates from alternative providers and allegations of fraud in the student loan system.

Highlighting a recent National Audit Office report into the government鈥檚 progress on overseeing alternative providers, Liberal Democrat Layla Moran questioned Mr Slater on why the government appeared so 鈥渁ccepting鈥 of high non-continuation rates among students in the alternative sector.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淭here is a serious lag time between data and reporting,鈥 she said. 鈥淚f a student dropped out in October, it would take well into the next year for something to happen at that provider.鈥

The result is that the institution is not held to account and students are lost from the system, Ms Moran added.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr Slater replied that it was the DfE鈥檚 intention to collect data from universities and other higher education institutions on a termly instead of yearly when the new Office for Students鈥 regulatory framework comes into force in 2019-20.

Currently, there is no way of telling exactly how many students drop out in real-time, since the government 鈥渄oes not have online access to digital attendance regimes for 112 providers,鈥 he said. 鈥淚f we did that would [make it] easy鈥ut it鈥檚 going to take some time to get that right. We are working on a plan.鈥

Conservative MP Heidi Allen retorted: 鈥淗ow on earth can you not have [student attendance] data and never have sought this data? This is taxpayers鈥 money, this is funding. If a student is not there we should know about it.

鈥淚 find it absolutely mind-boggling that we鈥檝e been so sloppy and don鈥檛 have this data. Why has it taken an NAO report for us to realise we need it?鈥

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

About 拢400 million is paid to 112 private colleges in England every year through the student loan system. The government is hoping to expand the sector following the passing of the Higher Education and Research Act earlier last year.

Dropout rates in the alternative sector were put at 25 per cent by the NAO report, 15 per cent higher than the rest of the higher education sector. Meanwhile 拢36 million of public money had been paid to 鈥渋neligible鈥 students at alternative providers, the report added.

A BBC Panorama聽programme broadcast last November also alleged that some students were being fraudulently enrolled onto courses in alternative providers in order to draw down student loan funding.

rachael.pells@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT