探花视频

Personnel 'can't be chosen on citations alone'

Published on
January 31, 2013
Last updated
May 22, 2015

Universities should not depend solely on citation statistics when making personnel decisions, the new head of Thomson Reuters鈥 Scientific and Scholarly Research unit has said.

Gordon Macomber, who was appointed the unit鈥檚 managing director earlier this month, described citations as a 鈥渨onderful methodology鈥 to analyse research because they are generated entirely by researchers themselves 鈥渂ased on their need to produce the best research鈥.

But he said his company - which owns the widely used Web of Knowledge and Web of Science citation databases - had no control over the quality of the decisions its customers make, and admitted that over-reliance on citations in judging individual academics鈥 performance had led to some 鈥渂ad decisions鈥.

鈥淭here are a lot of other variables on the table when you are making personnel decisions,鈥 he said.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr Macomber also unveiled plans to set up a customer advisory board and user forums to help co-create future products. He said this reflected a cultural shift whereby the company now regarded its products as belonging to its customers.

He said Thomson Reuters was monitoring the rise of article-level metrics and altmetrics - such as the number of mentions a paper receives on blogs and in social media - 鈥渢rying to tease out what looks right for us to become involved in鈥.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

But his unwillingness to jeopardise the Web of Knowledge鈥檚 reputation as the 鈥済old standard鈥 of metrics meant he would not be 鈥渜uick to make adjustments鈥.

That reputation also justified the platform鈥檚 exclusivity in terms of the journals it indexed; critics have claimed that this makes it less useful to large, emerging research powers such as India, whose academics often publish in non-indexed journals, than its rivals.

He did not regard his company as being in competition with other platforms such as Google Scholar and Elsevier鈥檚 Scopus, insisting that they were complementary.

鈥淲e do a lot of human curation, whereas Google Scholar is more algorithmically generated. The Web of Knowledge is relied on for consistency and transparency,鈥 he said.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

paul.jump@tsleducation.com.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT