探花视频

Reform threatens Bangor funding after students refuse to host MPs

Right-wing party leaders criticise students and suggest public funding should be revoked after Welsh university society snubs members

Published on
February 10, 2026
Last updated
February 10, 2026
Red and blue 'Keep Out' signs on a fence by the sea
Source: iStock/Paul Gorvett

A Reform politician has said Bangor University students should have their access to student loans revoked after a campus society refused to hold an event with the party鈥檚 members.

The university鈥檚 Debating and Political Society said it had refused a request from Jack Anderton, a political campaigner linked to Reform UK, and Sarah Pochin, Reform MP for Runcorn and Helsby, to attend Bangor and hold a question and answer session聽

In a statement circulating on social media, the society said the request was refused 鈥渋n line with our values鈥.聽

The group said it had 鈥渮ero tolerance for any form of racism, transphobia, or homophobia displayed by the members of Reform UK鈥.聽

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淭heir approach to the lives of others is antithetical to the values of welcoming and fair debate that our society has upheld for 177 years,鈥 it continues.聽

Reform officials criticised the response. Writing on X, the party鈥檚 deputy leader Richard Tice says: 鈥淚n line with our values, if Bangor Uni does not believe in free speech, then British taxpayers should not have to fund them. Perhaps remove all government funding and no student loans for Bangor students. The phone will ring very soon.鈥

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

Similarly, Zia Yusuf, Reform鈥檚 head of policy, claimed that the聽institution receives 拢30 million in state funding each year 鈥 鈥渕uch of which comes from Reform-voting taxpayers鈥.

鈥淚 am sure they won鈥檛 mind losing every penny of that state funding under a Reform government,鈥 he writes. 鈥淎fter all, they wouldn鈥檛 want a racist鈥檚 money would they?鈥

Claire Hughes, Labour鈥檚 MP in Bangor, described Reform鈥檚 response as 鈥減athetic鈥. She posted on X: 鈥淩eform offer nothing but division. Fancy accusing Bangor University of 鈥榖anning鈥 Reform and issuing threats. All because a debating society turned them down鈥?鈥澛

University free speech campaigners have also weighed in, with the Alumni for Free Speech group writing that student societies are 鈥渇ree to decide who they invite鈥 but warning that 鈥渂lanket 鈥榥ot welcome鈥 statements are a governance red flag鈥 that 鈥渞isk normalising informal exclusion and chilling lawful debate鈥.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

New laws that came into force last year聽place a聽greater onus聽on universities to protect and promote free speech on campuses but they only apply in England.

Recent polling by the Higher Education Policy Institute found that more than a third of students in the UK believe representatives of Reform should be banned from speaking at universities, despite the majority agreeing that higher education institutions should promote free speech.

Bangor University told the BBC that said societies were run by the students鈥 union, and it welcomed debate 鈥渁cross the political spectrum鈥.

In its statement, the society said it was 鈥減roud to be the first of the debating unions to take a stand against Reform UK鈥.聽

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淲e strongly implore our fellow societies to join us in keeping hate out of our universities鈥.

helen.packer@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Related universities

Reader's comments (5)

Reform has more support than any other Party and might form the next Government - Us as supposedly the bastions of free speech and academic/intellectual open enquiry should be engaging with Reform (and bet these students would welcome the Greens who - like all the parties - have their fair share of daft & destructive policies).
We might not like Farage and the rest of is party but it is a mainstream political party which describes itself as Centre Right at about 30% or so in the polls. We need to distinguish such parties from Tommy Robinson and others in my view and this does not help.
Just because you dislike someone's opinions, it's not a good idea to refuse to hear them... I'm sure Bangor students could run rings around them in debate, far more telling than telling them they may not come at all. I still remember the great fun we had in the early 1980s when a representative of the IRA turned up on the University of York campus. The poor dear was heckled to tears... and that's before the party poppers started going off. Then he almost had a childish accident!
Well if you are heckling and letting off party poppers (rather childish?), surely you are "refusing to hear them" or engage with their arguments which is just as bad. And of course, this is exactly what ReformUK want to happen, banning or disrupting just provides them with the ammunition they seek in depicting their opponents as intolerant in my opinion. I assume that the IRA person in question justifed the use of political violence and terrorism? Tbis simply is not the case here and the two are not in any way comparable.
However much commentators want to criticise the society in question (and they are free to do so) - the society is not the University. The comments from senior Reform members suggest they either are pretty ill-informed about what they are commenting on or, much more worrying, they are prepared to use taxpayers money, and risk thousands of jobs, just to target institutions they dislike. Not something to be ignored for people who value free speech!

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT