探花视频

Salford鈥檚 vice-chancellor鈥檚 candid mea culpa

Martin Hall offers regrets after inglorious June but remains committed to post

Published on
June 13, 2013
Last updated
May 27, 2015

Not many vice-chancellors own up to their universities being 鈥渢oo aggressive鈥 on job cuts, or lament the 鈥渢ragedy鈥 of closing languages courses when their institution is doing just that.

But given the University of Salford鈥檚 disastrous start to the month of June, it appears that Martin Hall, its vice-chancellor, has decided to think outside the box.

Last week, Salford disclosed that several courses, including modern languages, linguistics and areas of politics and contemporary history, would be closed; it announced yet another round of job cuts; and news emerged that its deputy vice-chancellor, Adrian Graves, had been sacked for gross misconduct after a 鈥渇urious bust-up鈥 with a student at the university鈥檚 swimming pool.

Add in continuing controversy over the cost of Salford鈥檚 new building at MediaCityUK and the university鈥檚 failed libel action against a former lecturer, and it might appear that Professor Hall鈥檚 cup is overflowing with a toxic and possibly overpowering brew.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

Is it fair for the University and College Union to say that there have been 13 rounds of job cuts at Salford in less than two years?

鈥淵es, it is,鈥 Professor Hall told 探花视频. Salford had 鈥渢oo aggressive an industrial-relations stance in previous years. We鈥檝e got new leadership now in that area within the university.鈥

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

Was Dr Graves sacked over the swimming pool incident alone, or was the decision linked to a power struggle at the top of the institution?

鈥淭he charge was one of gross misconduct,鈥 said Professor Hall, stating that the decision had been taken by a special council committee.

鈥淭hat was the charge鈥n which he was dismissed. It was unaccept-able behaviour [towards a student].鈥

On the course closures, Professor Hall said that applications on the programmes were 鈥渁 third of what we need for viability鈥. He added that Salford had lobbied government and sector officials to extend support for modern languages, 鈥渂ut that鈥檚 not forthcoming鈥.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

The vice-chancellor described the closure of modern languages courses at universities around the country as a 鈥渢ragedy鈥, but added: 鈥淚 can鈥檛 shore up a national policy failure from one small university. What I鈥檓 doing is what everybody else has done.鈥

On MediaCityUK, Professor Hall said that the building was 鈥渨orth every penny鈥. It has cost a reported 拢2 million a year in rent and 拢30 million in fitting-out costs.

鈥淲ithout it we would have very little distinctiveness as a way forward,鈥 he added.

The failed libel action against former Salford lecturer Gary Duke, who criticised Professor Hall and Dr Graves, is reported to have cost more than 拢100,000 after a judge ruled that the university could not take action as the matter centred on individuals.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

Professor Hall countered that it was 鈥渘ever about me鈥 but 鈥渨as primarily about students and the university鈥. Pursuing the action was 鈥渁 judgement call鈥 and he 鈥渦nderstands鈥 the criticism, the vice-chancellor added.

Does he feel positive about the future at Salford and his ability to lead it? 鈥淚鈥檓 positive about being here, because otherwise I wouldn鈥檛 be here. I鈥檝e got other places I could be,鈥 Professor Hall said.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

And he argued that in the context of recession, fluctuating student demand in a turbulent sector and previous job cuts, Salford was 鈥渄oing well鈥.

john.morgan@tsleducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (1)

鈥淚 can鈥檛 shore up a national policy failure from one small university. What I鈥檓 doing is what everybody else has done.鈥 Can this be interpreted as an admission that university management teams in the UK have been closing departments and sacking academics because the UK government has encouraged or allowed them to do so? 1. "I do what others do" is normally not accepted as an excuse. 2. How much damage needs to be inflicted before a failed national policy in Higher Education gets to be revised? 3. What about the UK's obligations under the UNESCO provisions for protection of academic freedom? See also an editorial in the Journal of Pathology http://journalofpathology.wordpress.com/2013/06/07/does-the-ref-have-an-impact-on-mental-health/ Thank you for having answered to the growing criticism you face (including from me). We continue to disagree on the way forward.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT