探花视频

Scottish play for power: high aims or pure politics?

Holyrood seeks power over admissions, governance and, via the SFC, courses. David Matthews reports

Published on
December 6, 2012
Last updated
July 13, 2016

A bill giving the Scottish government powers over university governance, admissions and courses will open the door to 鈥減olitical interference鈥, the University and College Union has said.

The Post-16 Education (Scotland) Bill, announced on November, would give Holyrood powers to change university governance and demand initiatives aimed at allowing more pupils from poor backgrounds to enter university.

The legislation gives the Scottish Funding Council 鈥渨ith the consent of the Scottish Ministers鈥 the ability to review higher and further education in Scotland, including the 鈥渢ypes of programmes of learning or courses of education鈥.

A spokesman for UCU Scotland said that 鈥渋f there was a department critical of the government (ministers) could ask the funding council to review that鈥. The union did not think the Scottish National Party intended to interfere with course content, he added, but the legislation made this a 鈥減ossibility鈥 for future governments.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

Although the SFC would conduct the review and decide on changes, it was strongly influenced by the government, the UCU spokesman said.

Mary Senior, the UCU鈥檚 Scottish official, said that the changes brought 鈥渢he possibility of political interference in the provision and content of courses, undermining both the institutional autonomy of universities and the academic freedom of lecturers鈥.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

A government spokesman said that the bill would help the SFC to ensure 鈥渃oherence in provision鈥 but stressed that universities would remain 鈥渁utonomous, independent bodies, and there are no powers over course content鈥.

Robin Parker, president of the National Union of Students in Scotland, said that the new powers could be used to protect at-risk courses. But, he added, 鈥渋f the power were to be used to attempt to force mergers on institutions we would oppose it鈥.

The bill also gives ministers direct power to force universities to do more to recruit disadvantaged students, against rising criticism of the widening-access record of Scotland鈥檚 most selective institutions.

In June, the NUS revealed that the University of St Andrews, with an undergraduate cohort of 7,370, accepted just 13 students from the poorest fifth of Scottish postcodes in 2010-11. It has committed to raise that figure to 20, and the University of Glasgow has said it will try to recruit 180 students from the poorest fifth by 2014-15.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

The legislation allows the government to withhold money if a university fails to comply with a widening access agreement.

It also gives ministers the power to withhold funding until 鈥渁ny principles of governance or management which the Scottish Ministers consider to constitute good practice鈥 are adopted by an institution.

In a statement, Pete Downes, convener of Universities Scotland and vice-chancellor of the University of Dundee, says that it is important 鈥渢o ensure that the legislation gets the nature of the complex relationship between the Scottish Government, the Funding Council and universities right鈥. Universities need 鈥渁 framework of institutional autonomy鈥, he adds.

david.matthews@tsleducation.com.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT