探花视频

Stop charging overseas Brits international fees, say expats

Calls for change as ‘inconsistent’ system leaves some forced to choose between their preferred university and saving money

Published on
November 3, 2025
Last updated
November 3, 2025
Unknown fans dressed in Union Jack flags and hats in the Olympic Park in Stratford, East London
Source: iStock/digitalchateau

British nationals?living abroad?have called on UK universities to introduce a new tuition fee tier to put an end to the requirement?that they?pay international student prices.

Currently,?expats?may not be eligible for home fee status when they return to the UK for higher education and are instead required to pay international fees, which can be up to three times as much.

Many people who move abroad “don’t realise that when their kid finishes school and they get sent back to England, they are probably going to have to pay international fees”, said Simon Landy, head of the policy group for higher education fee reform at the British Overseas Voters Forum.

“It comes as something of a shock to a lot of people and it seemed to us that this was an inadvertent consequence of policy rather than a deliberate policy.”

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

Although the system is designed to stop those who don’t pay taxes in the UK from benefiting from subsidised education, a new policy paper from the British Overseas Voters Forum criticises this unequal treatment and highlights the inconsistent approach UK citizens living overseas face when applying to university.

Currently, institutions are left to decide whether or not a student qualifies for home fees.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

“Many overseas students will be offered a basket of home and international fees when applying to different institutions and often have to spend a great deal of time and money proving links to the UK in order to qualify for a home fee offer,” the paper says.

While data on the topic is scarce, Landy said that anecdotal evidence suggests that higher-tier universities may be less flexible on granting home fee status, leaving students forced to decide between paying international fees or studying at a university that was not their first choice.

“Families are put in a position where they are trying to second-guess the decision-making process,” the paper says. “Some HEIs develop a reputation for being ‘soft’ on the home fee issue, others ‘difficult’.”

Landy said this “advantages people who…have the financial resources to investigate these things or hire consultants to help them get the home fee status”.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

The paper also highlights the impact on UK universities, which may be losing out on students.

“The current policy is detrimental to the finances of HEIs in two ways: it encourages British overseas students to seek less expensive higher education options outside the British system and it fails to generate significant income for HEIs due to the many British overseas students who achieve home fee status,” it says.?

Instead, the group suggests introducing a new fee cap for British overseas students that falls between home and international fees.

It adds that overseas students applying to high-cost courses, such as medicine and dentistry, could be required to stay and work in the UK for a given period after graduating.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

The group also calls for these students to be able to access UK student loans and for the application process to be simplified by establishing a standard fee-status questionnaire for use by all higher education institutions.

The paper adds that universities should allow British overseas students to qualify for home-fee status if they or their parents or guardians have been paying UK income taxes prior to enrolment.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

“This is a way of bringing young Brits back into the system and hopefully they’ll be creating economic benefit for the country,” said Landy.

helen.packer@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (9)

Well, if these people are ex-pats, rather than just UK citizens working abroad temporarily, I really do not see why they should not pay the international fee rate. otherwise they are having their cake and eating it. But if, prior to their enrolment, these people have been paying UK tax and are British citizens, then they are entitled to home fee rates surely?
Hear hear. Having two kids studying master's degrees as international students has been awful. People should be free to move abroad and still retain their status as domestic. This smacks to me of a Brexit mentality. I note that with diplomats' kids or army kids the institutions pay the difference. Not so for ordinary citizens. I have paid all tax and national insurance contributions in the meantime.
If you move abroad and stop paying taxes in the UK, why exactly should you be entitled to subsidised education for your adult children? Choosing to leave the UK comes with costs - you can't have your cake and eat it.
UK should borrow from other countries, where once a citizen, always treated like one for payment of tuition fees. Citizens pay home tuition fees because the student status is pegged to citizenship, not where people work.
I have some empathy with this argument. Having spent a number of years working abroad (ironically, at a UK university branch campus), one of the reasons that I returned to the UK was to ensure that my children would qualify for home fee status when the time came. At the very least, the rules need to be much clearer and applied consistently.
This fiscal rule was actually introduced 45 years ago, in 1980 when Margaret Thatcher hiked the then overseas fees that was equivalent to UK fees (about ?500pa if I recall correctly) to 'full cost' fees three or four times that level. Thatcher's governmental vandalism introduced the 'three years residence not for purposes of education' policy to define what was meant by a 'home' student. There were rightly huge waves of student protests at the time - I remember going along to support one of the many occupations of university offices at the London School of Economics against the policy in 1980/81. In the 1980s when I was responsible for enrolment processes in a large UK higher education institution I had to tell many UK citizens living abroad (particularly those whose parents had emigrated to Canada a decade or two earlier as I recall) that was the UK government policy and told them to contact MPs and Tory Ministers if they disliked it. In the 1990s after the Maastricht treaty the definition of "home" eligibility had to be extended to those living in EU member states, but again I had to explain to those who had emigrated out of the EU but kept their EU nationality, particularly those emigrating to Israel, that while they didn't need a visa at the time they were nevertheless classified as full cost international students just like those living outside the EU eg from Norway. Many of the ex pats complaining about this will have voted for UK parties committed to destructive fee policy for decades, particularly the Tories but also Labour and LibDems supported it. I have every sympathy with the UK born students denied an aspiration for UK education, but little sympathy with the parents, who should have known and calculated the financial consequences before they chose to leave. I'd be supportive of the alternative policy of a freely open education system, but as far as I'm aware this has only been carried out in one instance anywhere in the globe - medical schools in Cuba. This is largely privileged and educated people who have the resources to have relocated trying to bend the system to their advantage, while being unsympathetic to anyone else excluded from UK or any other state's Higher Education opportunities by the growing fee and taxpayer cost burden. I have no sympathy. If the students want UK HE, they can come back, work and pay taxes for three years to re-earn their residence entitlement and then gain their residential domestic fees status - which in Scotland by the way is free for all undergraduate level education, paid by the taxpayer.
Wow - the repeated accusations of having one's cake and eating it. One goes abroad for all sorts of reasons, mostly temporarily for work. During this time it is not like one stops paying tax - you simply pay it there, or in the UK as well if you are still doing some work back in the UK. What's with the 'getting something for nothing' argument? And yes, parents do realise that this is going to happen, and hence why my kids went to university in another country but came back to do master's degrees in Oxford and London. It doesn't stop one from being shocked and disappointed at the costs, when the kids carry British passports.
Recognition of home status linked to nationality and consistency of application of the rules is needed . My daughter is having an enforced gap year because of this, despite me being a UK tax and national insurance payer even whilst overseas and home owner since 1986. she has a uk doctor, bank account and has been back most holidays. We have also contributed to the uk economy while overseas and during travel back here. Russell group universities particularly York and Durham are arrogant and more worried about giving places to students from minority groups to be politically correct rather than looking after ‘ British’ born and bred children. Yes it is a privilege to live overseas but not everyone earns big packages. Many people work for the professional development, altruistic and cultural opportunities offered. Even with savings, ?40000 a year to study away from home is unrealistic.The most galling fact is that even though we live here student finance won’t agree to the student loan… something that has to be paid back… how many home students get this and default… a fairer clear system needs to be put in place.
new
What is this talk of ‘subsidised’ HE for resident Brits? Yes, there is still a bit of taxpayer subsidy for STEM courses - in fact, a lot for Medicine. But otherwise the ?9500 is for most degree courses supposedly the actual cost of delivery - while the higher O/S student fees are more based on what the market will bear (and hence the huge range across Us according to the a U’s perceived brand value and hence the hoped-for extra employability prospects of its degree). Perhaps more a question of whether the non-resident young Brit can access the loans for Home fees and for living-costs? - as loan debt that is indeed eventually ‘subsidised’ by the taxpayer if not paid off after 40 years of deductions from earnings by HMRC…

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT