探花视频

Sussex students plan national demonstration

Campaigners at the University of Sussex plan to host a national demonstration against privatisation in higher education.

Published on
March 20, 2013
Last updated
May 26, 2015

Protesters say students, academics and university staff from around the country will join them on 25 March, with a number of student unions laying on transport for the demonstration.

At the time of writing, almost 800 people on the social networking site Facebook had said they would attend the event.

It comes as an occupation of Sussex鈥檚 Bramber House conference centre in protest at plans to outsource 235 estates and catering jobs聽approaches its seventh week.

The occupation has received political support, with Caroline Lucas, Green MP for Brighton Pavilion, tabling an Early Day Motion in Parliament on university outsourcing and the plans at Sussex.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

The motion, tabled on 19 March and so far also signed by Ms Lucas and five Labour MPs, shares occupiers concerns about third-party providers being contracted to undertake university services and at the government鈥檚 鈥減romotion of the commercialisation of the higher education sector鈥.

According to the occupiers, academics at Sussex are also increasingly getting behind their efforts.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

In a message on their Facebook page, academics in Sussex鈥檚 department of anthropology say they will 鈥渆ndeavour to make appropriate adjustments to teaching schedules鈥 in order to allow students who are taking part in the protest to remain engaged in their coursework.

They also say they support the occupation鈥檚 鈥渃ourageous efforts鈥 and share the students鈥 scepticism that outsourcing would genuinely provide better quality services.

Meanwhile the relationship between university management and some students remains fractious after a protester was deemed to be in breach of disciplinary rules for sending an 鈥渁busive鈥 email to a member of university management.

The message, which also expressed the student鈥檚 concerns over the outsourcing plans, suggested a manager鈥檚 job title might be changed to 鈥渄irector of corporate tyranny and human suffering鈥.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

At a hearing on 4 March the student was told he faced a 拢100 fine after declining to apologise. However, the punishment has since been changed to attending a one-to-one seminar with an academic on 鈥渆thical lines relating to the boundaries of 鈥榝air comment鈥 in polemical communications鈥.

A spokesman for the university told 探花视频 that it was the university鈥檚 aim to 鈥渋mprove services to staff and students through identifying high-quality external partners for catering and facilities management as we grow [in student numbers]鈥.

鈥淲e continue to have positive discussions with trades unions, including in relation to future pension provision for transferring staff. We are supporting transferring staff through [one-to-one] meetings and information sessions,鈥 he added.

elizabeth.gibney@tsleducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (1)

Academic institutions are obligated under the ECHR and the UK Education Reform Act to not only adhere to article 10's provisions on free speech but to advance and promote its cause. U. Sussex's heavy handed approach towards student dissent, in particular in relation to a non-threatening, non-profane, albeit strongly worded email is in direct opposition to both the letter and the spirit of the aforementioned laws. Sussex ought to be ashamed of their behavior and should retract all sanctions against the student.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT