探花视频

The week in higher education - 18 April 2013

Published on
April 18, 2013
Last updated
May 22, 2015
  • After two years of taking flak from the Left for setting up an 拢18,000-a-year liberal arts college, A.C. Grayling is now in the cross hairs of the Right. His crime: not enough deference to the late Baroness Thatcher after writing in The Independent on 9 April that celebrations over her death are 鈥渦nderstandable and justifiable鈥 and that 鈥渄eath does not confer privileges鈥. In The Times on 11 April, Libby Purves said the 鈥渕odish entrepreneurial professor鈥 was indistinguishable from the 鈥渃razed hard-Left鈥 rabble-rousers taking part in 鈥渞iotous street parties鈥. Professor Grayling, who ironically has been accused of establishing a Thatcherite higher education institution, the New College of the Humanities, was condemned by Ms Purves for his 鈥渟elf-importance and half- baked anthropology鈥 before she concluded that his views represent 鈥渁ll the smug, narrow, self-regarding, inhumane, mechanistic aridity of atheist academe鈥. Enduring such an attack from the Iron Lady鈥檚 defenders might yet win back Professor Grayling a few friends in the university fold.
  • When former Conservative leader William Hague boasted of drinking 14 pints a day as a student, most thought it unlikely. But apparently some students drink up to 100 units a day - more than three times the amount Mr Hague put away, according to the Daily Mail on 12 April. In a 鈥渨arning to all teenagers and their parents鈥, the paper related how one student, Emma Gould, 鈥渂ecame hooked on alcopops at the age of 15 and was soon downing up to 100 units a day鈥. She fitted her drinking around her lectures - starting early at 7am before collapsing at 6pm after a full day on campus. Ms Gould, then a biomedical student at the University of East Anglia, said she was soon heading to Ipswich鈥檚 red-light district to work as a prostitute to fund her habit. Now teetotal, she shared her story to raise awareness about the perils of booze.
  • Australia is to slash A$2.3 billion (拢1.6 billion) from the higher education budget to fund school reforms, The Australian reported on 14 April. The cuts by Julia Gillard鈥檚 Labor government are the biggest to the sector since John Howard鈥檚 1996 budget. Craig Emerson, the tertiary education minister, said the government would place an 鈥渆fficiency dividend鈥 of 2 per cent on university funding in 2014 and 1.25 per cent in 2015, saving about A$900 million. It will also scrap the 10 per cent discount for students who pay tuition fees up front. Most of the money - A$1.2 billion - will be saved by forcing students to repay A$2,000 start- up scholarships once they hit a salary threshold. The announcement is a blow to Universities Australia, which earlier this year launched a A$5 million lobbying campaign ahead of September鈥檚 federal election to highlight the need to invest in the sector.
  • The National Union of Students in Scotland has sought to pile pressure on the Edinburgh government to curb the pay of senior figures in the country鈥檚 universities, revealing on 15 April that 88 individuals in the Scottish academy earn the same or more than the 拢140,000 a year paid to Alex Salmond, Scotland鈥檚 first minister. The NUS wants a maximum ratio between the highest and the lowest earners, although their call went unheeded in a new draft code of governance for the sector, published on 16 April. The salary data perhaps shed new light on why Louise Richardson, principal of the University of St Andrews (salary 拢225,000 a year), told the Herald earlier this month that 拢9,000 a year was 鈥渧ery little to pay鈥 for a degree from her illustrious institution.
  • Academics and scientists criticised the government for what they described as a last-minute bid to water down libel reform, The Independent reported on 15 April. Ministers announced that they would seek to overturn a cross- party consensus that companies should have to show financial damage before they can sue a journalist or blogger when the defamation bill returned to the Commons this week. Simon Singh, the science writer who led the campaign to reform the UK鈥檚 defamation laws after he was sued for criticising the 鈥渂ogus treatments鈥 offered by some alternative medicine providers, said the amendment - which was expected to be voted on after 探花视频 went to press - meant that there would be no protection for those who tried to make similar statements in the future.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT