探花视频

The week in higher education - 20 March 2014

Published on
March 20, 2014
Last updated
May 22, 2015
  • The worst-kept secret in politics is finally out; education secretary Michael Gove wants to get his hands on universities. Having already forced his way into higher education by asking universities to oversee A levels, Mr Gove finally came clean about his full ambitions to expand his ministerial empire in a Financial Times interview on 15 March. Asked what he would like to do next, Mr Gove replied: 鈥淲hat I鈥檇 really like to do is this job, plus universities.鈥 He added: 鈥淚 think that universities and science should be in this department.鈥 With Mr Gove making no secret of his preference for Russell Group universities and Oxbridge traditions, his determination to wrest higher education away from Vince Cable鈥檚 business department will send a chill through some of the sector鈥檚 newer universities.
  • How on earth did the University of London spend 拢810 on cleaning some chalk off its foundation stone? That was the question posed by 49 academics who penned an open letter after student protester Konstancja Duff, 25, was convicted of criminal damage and ordered to reimburse the university for the cost of removing her chalk slogans in support of outsourced cleaners. Alongside the letter, the scholars enclosed some cleaning cloths with instructions on how chalk writing could be removed more cheaply. 鈥淎pplied in gentle circular motions to the affected area, you鈥檒l find it wonderfully efficient in removing unwanted chalk marks, leaving the material beneath clean and fresh,鈥 the letter states. According to the university, much of the cost incurred related to the destruction of gold leaf lettering during the 鈥渉igh-pressure hydro-cleaning鈥, a course of action also likely to bemuse academics.
  • The BBC has apologised to the London School of Economics for a 鈥渟erious failing鈥 over its use of a student trip to North Korea as a cover for secret filming. Students were kept in the dark about the risks of allowing Panorama reporter John Sweeney and a cameraman to join a student society trip to the communist state, according to a damning report by the BBC Trust. Students were informed that a journalist would be joining the trip during a meeting in a London pub, but that fell well short of an 鈥渋nformed discussion about the risks of the trip and whether they were worth taking鈥, the report says. The BBC had no exit plan for the students, who were unaware that Mr Sweeney and his team would separate from the group if detected, the trust adds. The use of an LSE address on a visa application for Mr Sweeney was also 鈥渋nappropriate鈥.
  • The resignations of several Russell Group vice-chancellors may be linked to growing pressure on higher education leaders to justify their high salaries, The Times claimed on 14 March. With the Thunderer now leading the boos and catcalls against 鈥渇at cat鈥 pay awards to university leaders, it impishly suggested that the 鈥渞etirements鈥 of several prominent university leaders announced recently may have been hastened by their governing councils. That trend may be accelerated by new draft guidance from the Committee of University Chairs, which 鈥渦rges them to become more effective at challenging leaders of their institutions鈥, The Times said. After 2012鈥檚 鈥渟hareholder spring鈥 toppled several chief executives and put the brakes on bosses鈥 pay, perhaps the high-pay awakening has finally reached higher education.
  • The Queen鈥檚 visit to Royal Holloway, University of London caused an unlikely rumpus after she used the occasion to speak on behalf of the world鈥檚 poor, The Daily Mirror reported on 14 March. Making a rare political statement, the monarch remarked that 鈥減oor people and their problems don鈥檛 get reported often, and they need all the assistance they can be given鈥, the paper said. It arose in a conversation with David Simon, professor of development geography, who had explained his work with poor people, particularly in Africa. Her comments, however, were branded 鈥渃rass and inappropriate鈥 by the anti-monarchist group Republic, who pointed out she was 鈥渁 multi-millionaire many times over and has no problems helping herself to public money鈥, although many more saluted what they saw as an admirable sympathy for the less well-off.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT