探花视频

University of Tasmania backpedals on Hobart campus relocation

New STEM proposal meets state鈥檚 needs and government鈥檚 demands, vice-chancellor says, but opponents say all relocation plans should be scrapped

Published on
November 8, 2024
Last updated
November 8, 2024
University of Tasmania
Source: THE

The University of Tasmania (UTas) has wound back plans to abandon its main campus in the upmarket Hobart suburb of Sandy Bay, announcing that the site will now house specialised facilities for science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM).

Vice-chancellor Rufus Black said the university鈥檚 鈥渢op priority鈥 was to establish contemporary STEM facilities in the island state鈥檚 south, and said UTas would lobby the state and federal governments for funding.

Professor Black also intends to sell off two university-owned sites in central Hobart, including a large block housing a car park and indoor basketball franchise, and seek parliamentary approval for commercial development of an uphill section of the Sandy Bay campus.

But land deals will not be enough to bankroll the new STEM campus, which necessitates 鈥渃omplete retrofits鈥 of some existing buildings and construction of new ones, he said. Like earlier campus upgrades in the northern centres of Burnie and Launceston, the Sandy Bay overhaul would 鈥渞equire support from all levels of government鈥.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

The A$500 million (拢257 million) project is 鈥渁n urgent priority for the state鈥 and will spawn opportunities to co-locate with businesses, he said. 鈥淯nless we get started in the next 12 to 18 months, Tasmania won鈥檛 have new STEM facilities until well into the 2030s, putting us decades behind the rest of the country.

鈥淪TEM facilities really matter when so many new jobs and the competitiveness of our existing industries are dependent on science and technology.鈥

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

UTas encountered bitter opposition to its plan to sell off or develop the Sandy Bay site, the university鈥檚 main home since the 1950s, and use the proceeds to bankroll聽a move into central Hobart. Administrators argued that Sandy Bay was inaccessible for many students and that upgrading its ageing infrastructure was unaffordable.

Hobart residents overwhelmingly rejected the plan in a non-binding plebiscite. A聽聽introduced in June, which is yet to be debated, would prevent the university disposing of Sandy Bay land without approval from both houses of parliament.

Lobby group聽聽welcomed the proposal to keep STEM at Sandy Bay and sell off 鈥渓argely unused鈥 blocks in the city. But co-chair Mike Foster criticised the university鈥檚 鈥渋rrational鈥 plan to relocate the business and humanities schools into the Forestry Building, a mid-city heritage site undergoing A$150-plus million renovations ahead of its 2026 opening.

He said people undertaking combined degrees in arts and law, for example, would be forced to shuttle three kilometres between Sandy Bay and the Forestry Building. 鈥淚t undermines the viability of the Sandy Bay campus because two key schools are absent. You need everybody there [for an] interdisciplinary environment.鈥

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr Foster said the Forestry Building, 鈥渢he remnant of the failed relocation project that鈥檚 never going to happen鈥, should be sold off to fund improvements at Sandy Bay.

UTas pro vice-chancellor Nicholas Farrelly said the site would be a 鈥渢hriving hub of cross-disciplinary education鈥illed with state-of-the-art, flexible teaching facilities. The Forestry Building is perfectly located for students and staff who are studying and researching the ways our society works economically, culturally and politically.鈥

Professor Black said the university鈥檚 plans for Hobart reflected Tasmanian educational needs and local, state and federal government policies. He said the university had been updating its 2017 business case for a new STEM precinct, originally planned for central Hobart, since the state government this year outlined its preference for STEM to remain at Sandy Bay.

The state government聽聽for the university鈥檚 plans and said it would lobby Canberra for funding.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

john.ross@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

The Universities Accord has underlined the importance of Australian universities that cater to non-traditional students. But getting that provision right is not easy when your every move has major implications across the regional economy. John Ross reports from the island state

28 March

While some universities are funding huge building projects out of international student fees, an increasing number in Australia and elsewhere are finding that the ground beneath their feet is the best foundation for reaching to the sky. But should universities really be swapping ivory towers for commercial skyscrapers? John Ross cranes his neck and wonders 

24 October

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT