探花视频

Do we need humanities graduates to deliver the industrial strategy?

Policymakers should take a broad view of the value of degree courses when building our future workforce, says Charlotte Hallahan

Published on
November 3, 2025
Last updated
November 3, 2025
Source: istock

Whether or not it’s cutting through with voters yet, the industrial strategy remains central to the UK government’s plans for economic growth. That’s why the recent seeks to secure the pipeline of skilled workers that will be needed to deliver it.

The paper promises to tackle “critical skills gaps” and signals an ambition to align post-16 provision more directly with the strategy’s (IS-8) – including life sciences, digital technologies, clean energy and the creative industries. It also promises to revive maintenance grants “to support disadvantaged students studying courses that support our missions and Industrial Strategy”.

However, the courses that the government appears to have in mind are in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. Of course these will help power vital R&D and achieve breakthroughs in emerging technologies. However, focusing overwhelmingly on STEM risks overlooking the valuable, multifaceted and sometimes unexpected contributions to IS-8 sectors of other academic fields.

Study in disciplines – social sciences, humanities and the arts – develops the skills that underpin a modern workforce: critical thinking, communication and creativity. These are not peripheral to the industrial strategy but essential to it. Given the growing importance and prevalence of AI, these skills will also support sectors to use emerging technologies critically and responsibly.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

New Russell Group analysis of graduate outcomes data reveals that 91 per cent of STEM graduates from high-tariff, research-intensive universities enter an IS-8 sector within five years of completing their first degrees – but so do 85 per cent of non-science graduates (the combined figure is 87 per cent).

Our analysis suggests that what counts as a IS-8-aligned degree may not be as narrow as some policymakers imagine. For instance, while 20 per cent of high-tariff English literature graduates enter the creative industries and 47 per cent enter professional services, 7 per cent progress to digital technologies. So do 8 per cent of high-tariff graduates in sociology, social policy and anthropology and 12 per cent of politics students. In total, 40 per cent of high-tariff graduates working in defence studied humanities and social sciences.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

Equally surprisingly, while 16 per cent of high-tariff engineering graduates end up in advanced manufacturing and 11 per cent work in digital technologies, 46 per cent work in professional services.

Such statistics are important to communicate widely given the White Paper’s expressed intention to rejig tertiary provision in an effort to fill skills gaps as quickly as possible. Skills England is taking the first steps in properly scoping out skills strengths and needs, nationally and regionally, and the recent shunting of the skills ministerial brief into the Department for Work and Pensions indicates an intention to better connect skills provision, in its many shapes and sizes, to the jobs market.

Our analysis suggests that a narrow focus on subjects is the wrong way to do that.

Our high-growth sectors need diverse skills to be successful. For example, consecutive governments have championed spin-outs, but to scale up and attract sizeable investment, these businesses not only need the scientists or engineers who make the technical breakthroughs, but a whole range of legal, creative, strategic and critical thinking skills – which SHAPE education provides.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

Promisingly, the White Paper acknowledges the importance of postgraduate skills in IS-8 growth. The few extra years that postgraduates spend honing their critical thinking and analysis skills build their confidence in self-directing projects and allow them to gain intimate knowledge of particular industries. This is reflected in our data, with 92 per cent of those having completed a postgraduate research (PGR) degree at any UK university progressing to IS-8 sectors within five years after graduation.

However, efforts are needed to secure that pipeline. While the Department for Education forecasts a 53 per cent rise in demand for workers with higher degrees by 2035 – the fastest demand growth across all qualification levels – admission of UK researchers to postgraduate degrees has fallen by 10 per cent since 2018-19. Research-intensive universities (which host 57 per cent of UK PGRs) need support and funding to sustain and grow their postgraduate research populations, and it’s welcome to see positive intentions towards this in the White Paper.

However, if SHAPE subjects are not championed alongside STEM – through funding and the right advice and guidance to students – then IS-8 businesses’ ability to recruit and develop the talented workers they need could be undermined by .

If the industrial strategy is to succeed, we’ll need English graduates as well as engineers, historians alongside computer scientists, and social scientists together with health professionals. To assume otherwise would be to do a grave disservice to students, universities and the economy.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

Charlotte Hallahan is a policy manager at the Russell Group.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (7)

Does the "White Paper" actually ask humanities graduates to deliver physically the so-called "industrial strategy"? Isn't "industrial strategy" a topic of the last century? How many empty metaphors can the author fit into a handful of paragraphs?
Could the author explain why they believe that STEM subjects do not teach "creativity , communication and communication" if the author actually took a STRM course they would find that these transferrable' skills are essential in completing an UG course. Sadly this tired old trope is repeatedly dragged into discussion. If you are curious why graduates do not provceed into IS-8 sectors why not go out and ask the students? It might be that given the graduates skills rewards are higher elsewhere, or that the sectors are not sufficiently attractive. Despite what the government might wish it is not clear it is the job of universities to train workers for one ore other sector. The choice remains where it always has with the students.
Well you are right here! What is the mechanism? Students choose their subjects for all sorts of reasons: usually, I think, because it is the subject they feel they are "best" at and they will get their best degree result (or be able to cope) with them or because it is less "boring" than the others. Of course, this means that students will often avoid the subjects they perceive to be difficult. These are often the STEM subjects and in AH, Languages. These are subjects that often require specific aptitudes as well, for examine some people are excellent at languages or mathematics, but most students tend not to be. Indeed, many will opt for what their peer group of friends is doing. The impact of peer group pressure on the adolescent mind is generally regarded as crucial. Indeed, though this is a little more controversial, we in the Arts and Humanities, in an attempt to get more students, these days often adopt more the Life-Style Coach approach to our subject, in which the student brings knowledge from their own life experience, rather than by academic study as such. So it will be very difficult to channel students into subjects that promote the government's "industrial or post-industrial" strategy. The problem is many of the cohort believe they will just not be able to cope with the difficulty of certain disciplines and avoid these whatever the sticks and carrots on offer. Of course, the best students in STEM and Arts and Humanities will always engage with creativity and communication and the mutual intellectual synergies of the arts and sciences, but the less motivated or able student will opt for the subject they feel is easiest for them and the one they are most likely to get by in. Characteristically, the Arts and Humanities (in my view) is more congenial than STEM in this respect. But it's irrelevant anyway, the problem is not Universities here but our school system which needs to prepare students to take these subjects and motivate them appropriately.
The paper does seem to assume that STEM graduates ("high tariff" at least which I think means intelligent) are a bit like Mr Spok and the Vulkans. Surely, this is illogical?
"However, the courses that the government appears to have in mind are in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplines." Is this true. Is not the "M" in STEM really standing for Medicine now?
"A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects." - Robert A. Heinlein Of course it doesn't mean that we shouldn't develop specific skills in a chosen area of expertise, just not at the expense of being a properly rounded individual. I'm still working on writing a decent sonnet, though.
new
Once again the tired and idiotic “opposition” between STEM and A&H. This is an artificial divide. Its at least partly bone out of the pathetic way the subjects are taught to children. Math in particular has all its delight and fascination squeezed out before its delivered by bred teachers teaching for the exam. English is just as bad. No STEM students aren't taught communication skills and A&H students aren't taught science competency, at least not in the UK. But factory farm schooling will never do that anyway.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT