探花视频

Lincoln staff vote for strike action over further job cuts

University employees back industrial action, accusing leaders of poor financial management

June 9, 2025
The University of Lincoln logo on one of the buildings.
Source: iStock/Peter Austin

Union members at the University of Lincoln have voted for strike action as the institution plans redundancies that could affect up to 285 employees.?

According to the University and College Union (UCU), the university announced a fresh round of redundancies after previously telling staff there were no plans for large-scale cuts.?

Last year, 220 employees left the university through voluntary severance and redundancies.?

In a ballot of UCU branch members, 86 per cent voted in favour of strike action, with a turnout of 61 per cent.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

In a statement, the union accused the university of “poorly” handling the financial crisis gripping the sector, saying leaders had made “imprudent spending decisions”.?

“Far from safeguarding jobs, vice chancellor Neal Juster has announced plans to threaten nearly 300 staff with redundancy ahead of further ‘restructuring’ in the next academic year, and possibly beyond,” said UCU general secretary Jo Grady.?

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

“Yearly cuts have damaged staff morale and management must look at this vote for strike action and begin listening to our concerns.”

Lincoln UCU members had already passed a vote of no confidence in the university’s senior leadership team last month.?

“If the vice-chancellor continues to refuse to change direction and rule out compulsory redundancies then we will be forced to strike,” Grady continued.?

A university spokesperson said,?“The University of Lincoln's priority will always be to put students first. We have plans in place to minimise any disruption to teaching or the student experience if industrial action goes ahead.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

"We remain committed to meaningful dialogue with trade unions as we reshape the university, in line with our refreshed strategy, to meet the needs of the students, communities and businesses we serve.”?

They added that the university expects "to achieve a breakeven position due to careful management of finances over the past two years".

“The changes we are making now - which include growing areas in response to student demand and areas that have the potential to generate income for the University - are key to adapt to the new higher education landscape and realise the bright future ahead,” they said.?

Lincoln is the latest in a line of struggling universities that could be affected by strike action, with union members at Sheffield, Bradford and Keele voting for industrial action in recent weeks.?

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

In May, the UCU threatened to call a national strike against the government over higher education funding as university finances continue to worsen across the country, with 10,000 jobs anticipated to be lost from the sector this year.?Legal experts have warned that such a strike could be challenged in court.

helen.packer@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Related universities

Reader's comments (2)

Same old, same old!
new
Watch this space.... The treatment of De Montfort University’s first-ever female Vice-Chancellor is a textbook example of the gendered double standards that continue to shape leadership in higher education. As 探花视频 has reported time and again, women in leadership roles are disproportionately subjected to personal attacks, excessive scrutiny, and unfair narratives that male leaders are rarely forced to endure. Assertiveness is misread as aggression, difficult decisions are labelled as dictatorial, and strategic change is framed as chaos—especially when led by women. What’s unfolding at DMU is not a failure of leadership! The intense and sustained efforts to discredit the current VC are not just disproportionate—they are disturbingly familiar. Instead of recognising the significance of her position as DMU’s first woman Vice-Chancellor, there has been a concerted effort to undermine and remove her. This is part of a wider pattern in UK academia, where women who drive reform are punished for their success. And yet, under her leadership, DMU has made nationally recognised strides in equality, inclusion, and institutional culture. The university has been awarded the Stonewall Workplace Equality Award, earned the Race Equality Charter, and hosts the UK’s only UN SDG Justice Hub—concrete signs of values-led leadership. Crucially, her tenure has also seen a deliberate and strategic increase in the number of women appointed to senior leadership roles across the university, helping to build a more diverse and representative leadership culture for the future. These are not the actions of a “toxic” leader—they are the actions of a woman leading meaningful change in a system that is still uncomfortable with that change. Instead of vilifying her, the sector should reflect on its own resistance to equity. If higher education truly values inclusion and transformation, it must stop treating women in power as threats—and start supporting them when they lead with courage and vision.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs